|
Corporate & Commercial Briefs
SHOULD I BUY REAL
ESTATE IN A COMPANY NAME?
Should I buy the
property in m y personal name or in my company name?
This is a typical poser a client puts before a Solicitor
on closing a property purchase. The answer to this would
typically be “it depends”. (I am sure you know that
lawyers seldom say “Yes” or “No”.) In fairness it really
depends on what you want to achieve. Personal name or
Company name – there are pros and cons. For the purpose
of this article I have chosen to highlight a few
advantages of buying property in a company name.
Ease of Transfer
Transfer of Property can be a cumbersome process
when we take into account the procedure for obtaining
Governor’s consent. There is an easier way round
however: buying the property in a company name allows
you to transfer the property to a purchaser by selling
the company. Procedure for change of company ownership
is a piece of cake as com pared to obtaining Governors
consent to a Deed of Assignment. This practical tool
applies particularly to persons who purchase property
for investment or resale. In all cases it is advisable
that each property in your real estate portfolio is held
by a distinct limited liability company, and these
companies should be utilized only for the business of
holding one property. If the company is used to hold m
ore than one property the company cannot be sold to a
prospect interested in only one of the properties. Also
if the company dabbles into all manners of transactions
it runs the risk of being entangled with liabilities or
commitments that make prospective purchasers wary of a
company purchase deal.
Perpetual Succession
The typical succession method used in Nigeria today
is by Letters of Administration (“LOA”) obtained by the
deceased family. Letters of Administration applies to
situations where the deceased left a will (died
intestate) or did not write a will (died intestate). In
both scenarios the family of the deceased cannot legally
transfer property of a deceased without first obtaining
a Letter of Administration.
A will is a complex legal document fraught with m any
legal rules and having even m ore exceptions. It is the
subject of much litigation and “contests”. Ironically
wills are prepared on the “assumption” that the testator
will die before the beneficiary. Who knows? Despite the
above a will however elegantly drafted is still subject
to payment of estate taxes. The discerning property
owner can take advantage of the simple company law
concept of perpetual succession.
With this concept a company unless legally liquidated or
wound up continues as an entity for as long as there is
a surviving shareholder. The surviving shareholder of
the company property owner becomes the owner of that
property by operation of law. In practice therefore,
assume Mr A owns 3 different properties held by 3
different companies he can position his 3 children as
shareholders and directors of each company instead of
writing a will to bequeath the properties.
Note that this is made easier if the 3 different
properties are held by different companies (as advised
in 1 above). If properly setup, the phrase “business as
usual” m ay aptly describe the succession in a company
(and ownership of the property) upon the death of the
father. The key is to ensure that the shares of the
father are held jointly with the child to whom the
shares are expected to be transmitted. Transmission on
demise therefore becomes automatic. It is advisable to
inform your Solicitor that the company is intended as a
vehicle for succession so that the articles and object
clauses are formatted to serve the purpose.
Saves transaction
costs
The Estate tax payable on a will or the Governors
consent fees on a Deed of Assignment inclusive of
incidental charges is usually between 10-20% of the
assessed value of the property. In most States the
property is actually valued by the Government surveyor
at the time of application.
However transferring property by simply selling the
company or by transmission of shares (discussed in 1 & 2
above) can save millions of Naira in transaction costs.
You would only need to pay the fees for filing new form
s reflecting the change at the Corporate Affairs
Commission and off course some Solicitor fees for
documentation. These are a drop in the ocean in
comparison to the financial and administrative resources
required for obtaining Governors consent or Letters of
Administration.
Limited Liability in
event of claims against personal property.
A company is a separate legal entity from the
individuals who make up the company and the liability of
the individuals is “limited” to their contribution in
the company. Holding landed asset in a company name
therefore protects that asset from distresses arising
from transactions entered into in your personal
capacity.
For example you gave a personal indemnity on a
transaction that has no nexus with the company and the
indemnity is about to be called in. In this situation
all property owned in your personal name can be attached
to cover the obligation, but those owned in the name of
the company are spared.
Property Owned by
Company is easier to Pledge
Companies by their nature are designed for the
marketplace. Therefore the commercial structure of
companies permits greater options for borrowing. Asset
held in company names therefore gives leverage to the
owner in the event that they have to be pledged.
For example debt for equity for deals, and debentures
are models that are strictly within the domain of
company law.
Confidentiality
Property bought in a company name gives a certain
level of confidentiality. At least it is not apparent
from the name on the title documents who owns the land
except your company is a well known brand. In the former
case it would take another search at the Corporate
Affairs Commission to lift the veil on the owner of the
property. If the shares in the holding company or the
property itself, is held in the name of a nominee
company lifting the veil would prove formidable.
Ease of Joint
Ownership
Holding property in company name makes joint
ownership easier in the sense that every shareholder is
a part owner of property owned by the company – at least
to the extent of his shareholding. This proves a very
useful tool in consortia real estate investment and
financing. A situation where multiple investors own a
property or portfolio of real estate can only be
envisaged under the company umbrella.
Power to establish
Trusts can be given the holding company.
Very often situations dictate that a trust ought to
be created before the demise of the property owner. This
is most relevant in situations where there are infants
involved or there is only one property and m any
survivors who ought to share from the derived income.
The articles of association of the company holding
property very often does permit the company to establish
a Trust. In such a case, setting up a trust after the
demise of the property owner would be a corporate
decision within the ambit of the company’s power.
How do we respond next time to the poser: Should I buy
property in a company name? I dare say the answer
remains: “It depends”!
Ayuli Jemide, is a
Partner with DETAIL. |